Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V9800P vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI FirePro V9800P vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V9800P
2.72 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +20%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.720 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
544.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
190W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Tonga
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
5 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy