Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD FirePro W2100 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +400%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

630 MHz
Base Clock
-
680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
20
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
435.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
27.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

26W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy