Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD FirePro S7150 x2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 265W)
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 x2 +160%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Feb 2016
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Server
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
265W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tonga
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Cloudy Tau
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy