Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000 +3520%
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT216
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy