Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

AMD FirePro W4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 +409%
6.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2019
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
1920
48
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.64 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
201.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.90 TFLOPS
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.451 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU106
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
TU106-200A-KA-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy