Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition +126%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy