AMD FirePro W4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4100
+107%
0.645 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 630
0.311 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W4100
+174%
475
GeForce GT 630
173
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.240 GPixel/s
20.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
645.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
311.0 GFLOPS
40.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
25.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cape Verde
GPU Name
GF108
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF108-400-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
