Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition +179%
1.933 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1344
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.13 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.933 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GSR-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy