Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1035MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q +666%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1035 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.12 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
82.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.299 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
82.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy