Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4190M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

AMD FirePro W4190M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M and 512MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 3850 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4190M +86%
0.691 TFLOPS
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
0.371 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro Mobile
Generation
M8x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.280 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.280 GTexel/s
-
-
-
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
371.2 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
M88
-
-
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy