Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300 +3561%
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GT218
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy