Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +399%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GA107
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy