Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA P106 090

AMD FirePro W4300 vs NVIDIA P106 090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 and 3GB VRAM P106 090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA P106 090 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
P106 090 +64%
2.352 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.49 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.74 GFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.352 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.49 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
GP106
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP106-090-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy