Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +168%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy