Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000 +154%
1.267 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV670
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy