Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

AMD FirePro W5000 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5000 +153%
1.267 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
39.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1267 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
79.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Oland
Pitcairn LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy