Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

AMD FirePro W5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +99%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Jul 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
TU116
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy