Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W5100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

AMD FirePro W5100 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W5100 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W5100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 330W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock2435MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W5100
1.428 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XTX +1645%
24.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2435 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
311.7 GPixel/s
44.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
779.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.87 TFLOPS
1428 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.93 TFLOPS
89.28 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.558 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
330W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Bonaire
GPU Name
Navi 21
Bonaire PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTXH (215-121000247)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy