AMD FirePro W6150M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1155MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+258%
5.914 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W6150M
1452
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Max Q
+421%
7575
Graphics Card
Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
73.92 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
11.83 TFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Emerald
GPU Name
TU104
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
