Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon 625 Mobile

AMD FirePro W6150M vs AMD Radeon 625 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M and 2GB VRAM Radeon 625 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 625 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1024MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6150M +110%
1.651 TFLOPS
Radeon 625 Mobile
0.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
May 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1024 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
88.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.192 GPixel/s
51.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.58 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
786.4 GFLOPS
1.651 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
786.4 GFLOPS
103.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
49.15 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
Polaris 24
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
Polaris 24 XT (216-0867030)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy