Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

AMD FirePro W6170M vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M and 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W6170M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W6170M +1163%
1.971 TFLOPS
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
14
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
61.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.971 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
123.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Emerald
GPU Name
GF119
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
GPU Variant
N12P-NS1-S-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy