Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000 +6135%
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GT218
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy