Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA P102 100

AMD FirePro W7000 vs NVIDIA P102 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 and 5GB VRAM P102 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1683MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (440.3GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
P102 100 +342%
10.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Feb 2018
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1582 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1376 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
440.3GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
1280
Shading Units
3200
80
TMUs
200
32
ROPs
80
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.6 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
168.3 GFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.77 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
336.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GP102
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GP102-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy