Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +15%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2020
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
896
112
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
TU106
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy