AMD FirePro W7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Boost Clock1019MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
+5%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
3.13 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tonga
GPU Name
GK104
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1
