Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

AMD FirePro W7100 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 106.0GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 215W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100 +592%
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 XT
0.476 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
106.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
320
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.89 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.89 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
475.5 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
215W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
R600
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
R600 XT (215RGMDKA13FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy