Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD FirePro W7100 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +1%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tonga PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy