Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000
3.226 TFLOPS
A30 PCIe +219%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1792
Shading Units
3584
112
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GA100
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy