Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

AMD FirePro W8000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
1696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8000 +1155%
3.226 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
1792
Shading Units
96
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
100.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.226 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
806.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
69W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT215
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy