Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

AMD FirePro W8100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (220W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +1%
4.219 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
4.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Sep 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2304
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK110B
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy