Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

AMD FirePro W8100 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W8100 +122%
4.219 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2015
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
131.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.219 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
2.109 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

220W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Hawaii GL40
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy