AMD FirePro W9000 vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Arc A780
+351%
18.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
128
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-512
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
