Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD FirePro W9000 vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000 +232%
3.994 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2008
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
800
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
151W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy