Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

AMD FirePro W9000 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (274W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +41%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
998.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
580W
600 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy