AMD FirePro W9100 vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100
+24%
5.238 TFLOPS
Arc A380
4.198 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
FirePro W9100
3552
Arc A380
+20%
4277
Graphics Card
Mar 2014
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1024
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Hawaii
GPU Name
DG2-128
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
