Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

AMD FirePro W9100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W9100 +456%
5.238 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 460 X2
0.942 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
7
2816
Shading Units
336
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.814 GPixel/s
163.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.238 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
941.5 GFLOPS
2.619 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF104
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
GF104-300-KB-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy