AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
+333%
4.339 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireStream
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
