AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM AMD Radeon 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 540 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+10%
1 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon 540
0.908 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.39 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
908.5 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
908.5 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
56.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Lexa
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO
(215-0904018)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
