AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 10GB VRAM CMP 170HX 10 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 10 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.56TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX 10 GB
+1163%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.56TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
800
Shading Units
4480
40
TMUs
280
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
10 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA100-105A-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
