AMD FireStream 9250 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+30%
1 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2011
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
480
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Turks
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
