AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD FirePro W8100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100
+321%
4.219 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2014
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Hawaii
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
