Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1468MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250 +32%
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 1010
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1228 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.74 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.49 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
751.6 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GP108
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP108-200-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy