AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+4310%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2024
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2340 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
66
800
Shading Units
8448
40
TMUs
264
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
264
-
RT Cores
66
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
