AMD FireStream 9250 vs NVIDIA P106 100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 6GB VRAM P106 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA P106 100 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1709MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.2GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
P106 100
+337%
4.375 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1709 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
192.2GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
800
Shading Units
1280
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
82.03 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
136.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
68.36 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.375 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP106
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
