AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2920MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+4684%
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2025
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1660 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 48
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
