AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP
We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 6250 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
720 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (7W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+2172%
1 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250 IGP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2012
FireStream
Generation
Palm
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR3
Memory Type
System Shared
256bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.104 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.208 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.16 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
7W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Loveland
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.45 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
75 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
