AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200
+65%
1.658 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Polaris 23
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
