AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
+61%
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Tobago
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
