AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
+760%
8.602 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Fiji
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8
(215-0862040)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3
