AMD FireStream 9250 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 6650 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 176W)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2635MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6650 XT
+979%
10.79 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2022
FireStream
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2055 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2635 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2190 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
280.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
168.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
337.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.59 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.79 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
674.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
176W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 23
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 23 KXT
(215-130000136)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
